â€œGoneâ€. It’s a word that many use as a more timid way of saying someone is dead.
This is one of those usages that makes no sense to me. Nor does the impetus behind the usage. Birth and Death are the only things that all of us experience. Our only universally shared experience. Only there’s not enough of us yet at birth to record the experience in any meaningful way.
That leaves only death.
It’s not only cowardice, of course, that prompts one to say â€œhe is goneâ€ instead of â€œhe’s deadâ€. It’s a literary device, or it’s an abstraction that’s properly aligned to a given context, perhaps. But those are not the uses that bother me.
Why do I bring this up? No, I’m not so morbidly moribund, even though I play such a one in my blog of late. I bring it up because the usage of â€œgoneâ€ to mean â€œdeadâ€ is so alien to me at this point that I actually miss the implication of â€œgoneâ€ sometimes. It’s an interesting (to me) state of mind, misinterpreting a death-statement because the speaker thinks of â€œdeadâ€ as some kind of imprecation.
[beat]I normally hate this â€œafter the cutâ€ or â€œread moreâ€ things, but thar be spoilers ahead, and I hate ruining things for people more than I hate the â€œread moreâ€ conceit. So if you want to continue, well, click on the â€œRead Moreâ€ below. Also? The comments also contain spoilers.