Enteralgia, inter alia

| | Comments (8) | TrackBacks (0)

You know you've landed in a strange, strange place when you find yourself asking your therapist with all earnestness, “So do you think I should be less like me?”

Ronald, my therapist, is a dear, sweet man. For years I've gone to see him once a month (think: verbal blogging), but I went more frequently while I was out on disability—there was a lot going on. Ironically, on my return to work, I not only went back to once a month sessions, but through scheduling problems, it had been two months since I'd been to see him.

[beat]

So do Latin phrases ever randomly enter your mind? And if not, how about medical terminology? Or if so, do the two ever overlap and commingle? No? Huh.

So I was, uhhh, having some, uhhhh, gastric distress today while working at home (yes, working all day on a Saturday, and tomorrow will be more of the same), and while that may have been apropos of nothing at the time, while I was out getting some dinner with Soonae and Jong this evening, the phrase inter alia crossed my mind. Well, we were in Colma at the time. Wait, that's a lie. Technically, the phrase “inter algia” entered my mind, but it didn't have a valid keycard so it had to wait outside of security until its identity could be verified.

I got home and looked it up. Nope. I was right about being wrong. I tried “inter alia” and something clicked in my head even before dictionary.com told me I was right this time. “Inter alia” means “among other things”. Inter = between or among; Alia is the accusative form of “alias” or “other”. See? Simple.

So “algia” is a medical combining form, meaning “pain” (neuralgia = nerve pain, analgesic = pain reliever, etc.), and where did that come from?

Enter: “enter”. It's the combining form of “enteral”, which means “passing through the intestine”. “Enteralgia” is “Severe abdominal pain accompanying spasms of the intestine.”

Syncretism! Syncretism!

[beat]

So why would I ask if I should be less like me? And of my therapist, no less? My persona, my moxie, my stubbornness, single-mindedness, small tolerance for bullshit, large vocabulary, short temper for duplicity, long view of consequence, all-of-the-above, none-of-the-above, take-your-pick have caused any number of people in my life and not in my life (anymore) to welcome my opinions, hear them, say nothing for a while, wait for me to ask if everything's ok, then stage a nuclear nutty on the way out.

Ronald suggested that I may be intimidating. A few months ago when I was in NYC, JMG suggested that I am “almost elfin”. Well, you reconcile it!

Ronald added that perhaps the idea that real-time interaction was a daunting prospect, that maybe the simple notion of a heated tête-à-tête with me was cause to shrink back, and with a technicolor wake of histrionics to sleight-of-hand the escape (ok, that last part is my idea).

The irony is that it's so fiendishly simple to knock me off balance and destroy any poise—intellectual or otherwise—I may possess. No, silly girls, I'm not going to tell you how—even if I knew what how to accomplish it. Then again, if I knew how it was accomplished, it would no longer be effective, right?

This is not a sonnet to the Portuguese nor a song of Solomon nor a timorous poem at the Mic. Like the very raison d'etat and even raison d'être of this weblog, it's just one of the thousand things I think about.

Or maybe I'm dyspeptic.

Technorati Tags






0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Enteralgia, inter alia.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.godofbiscuits.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1504

8 Comments

Joe.My.God. said:

You are tiny and adorkable.

Giovanni said:

Ok, this topic: "Should I be less like myself" catches my interest.
MY EXPERT & INFALLIBLE OPINION: The first major and unanswerable question is who are we? Can we prove who we are? How much of us is us and how much is a creation of sociological influences and shaping? Did we conform too much? Not enough? To what? To whom? Who and what influenced us? Why did it? Important note: there are studies that tested infants and data showed that people are indeed born with vastly different temperaments, apptitudes, interests, traits and characteristics. Ok, so what I hear you asking isn't if you should be less like you, but rather, perhaps, if you are currently self-actualizing correctly. Maybe you're concerned that you took a wrong turn somewhere, maybe you're wondering if you should have tried that other procedure or that far-fetched option that you didn't think would work out. A famous person from not so long ago encouraged us to "Come Out". That means a lot of things. We develop. Vast and small changes are always possible; data shows that people stop using substances, they lose 90 lbs, they grow muscles. Our temperaments can be shaped, refined. The spirit at the core of our being thrives on being explored. And finally, we hold the remote control, we direct our browsers, we drive our Vespas. We cannnot let our external panorama come crashing into us and/or dictate our choices to us or we cease to exist.


Dagon said:

But “algia” is Greek and "inter" is Latin!

No mixing! Forbidden! Forbidden!

i didn't say "enteralgia" was a latin term. :)

Dagon said:

An unholy Chimera!

noelbear said:

Is there an inherent syncretism in a dyspeptic chimera?

Is it significant that 'aglia' is greek for pain but "aglio' is Italian for garlic?

Should I be ashamed that the source of my recognition of the word "chimera" is adolescent years spent playing Dungeons and Dragons?

Do you struggle like the priest in Edward Albee's "Tiny Alice" to reconcile the abstraction of you to the you that was created in your image; the personification of you available for outward scrutiny?

There is no struggle at the center: I've turned the Ptolemaic system around and put myself in the middle of it all: net-gravity = 0, baby.

Hottie-Noel said:

Is there an inherent syncretism in a dyspeptic chimera?

No, but there's inherent saccharism in diet dyspepsicola, you D&D freakazoid. :)

Josh(ums) said:

If you were less like you are, I might like you less too, as I like you for who you are.

And then again, if you were less like yourself and more like someone else who I really like, then I might still really like you, except then I'd be in like with you for being someone whom you're really not, and that's not really the same as liking you at all, is it?

Leave a comment

Author

Tag Cloud

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

augustus 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Archives

Tweets


Blogroll

Progressive Blog Alliance