« Paul Haggis Sucks | Main | Kramer vs Crammer »

4 maart 2007

Ann Coulter Improves

...there was another direction to go?

The blogs are abuzz with Ann Coulter, that walking, talking shitstain ok, shitstain of a human being.

Poor Ann is upset that she can't say the word “faggot” in the context of insulting and belittling and trivializing a married man with children for whom there is no indication of anything but painfully average heterosexuality.

So let's think about this. If she's not calling him gay, what could she possibly be up to when calling John Edwards a “faggot”? Wait. One aside: She didn't actually say the words, 'John Edwards is a faggot'. She was being coy—well, what she thinks is coy—by first mentioning John Edwards, then saying “it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot'”.

Ow, my sides from laughter. Who's writing her material, Paul Haggis?

This is what comes of a Republican trying to be snarky. Give it up, folks, just like you gave up on trying to understand irony so very long ago.

So where's the improvement, you ask? She's being direct instead of circumspect. How can someone that's been such a soulless cunt for so long not have been direct all along? I'd ask you to go read some of her columns, but I don't hate you that much. Hell, I don't hate her enough to ask her to read her own effluvia, so you'll have to trust me. Her typical pattern is to hang something that's so painfully obvious out there as if she's walking you down Hell's Garden Path™ and then ooo! Pounce! She just nails you (ew) with the point you (and by “you” I mean, her typical learning-impaired reader) with the point of her tirade. Forgiveness for the imagery of Ann Coulter pouncing on you and nailing you.

So, that improvement. It's in the economy of words she can expect to employ in her columns from here on forward. She just has to write “We Republicans are better than faggots, niggers, ragheads, chinks, dykes, gooks and Liberals” and she's done with anything she'll ever have to say again.

As a woman who espouses “family values” but has never been married nor had children and a heterosexual who's never seen with male companionship, she's finally out of the closet. Or at least her hate is.

The beauty of this is that hate, when exposed to the bright glare of other human beings, tends to transform itself into something else. At one end of the spectrum of possible results, the hater learns what's wrong with the hating. At the other end, that person is destroyed.

I'll leave it to the reader to decide which is the better fate for Ann.

I'll also leave it to the reader to simply watch Ann in action at CPAC (and to listen for the cautiously gleeful tittering of the crowd when she says the f-word):

You realize, don't you, that Ann doesn't really believe John Edwards is a 'faggot'? This is Ann desperately trying to remain topical and—cough, cough—relevant by circumspectly commenting on all the high profile anti-gay statements of late. Ann “if you can't think of anything hateful to say, don't say anything” Coulter always has to say something, so she shoehorned John Edwards into it. That's really all there is to it.

We can cut her head off—she has no productive use for it—but I expect the Asian American Michelle “In Defense of Interment Camps” Malkin's head would only grow in its place.

It's difficult to watch anything die slowly, unless you're Ann. Now it's the Conservative movement that's dying, and there's pain and throes and writhing. It's not easy to watch and there is no glee. But I will be happy when its destructive power is gone.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted by jeff at 4 maart 2007 13:45

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.godofbiscuits.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1583

Comments

The conservative movement is not going away, even though Ann Coulter may be. However, it is separating into libertarian, religious, and more moderate wings.

BTW, please re-read my comment on the Atlas website. You misconstrued it. I wrote that there is no proof that Edwards is gay. Your comment implied that I wrote just the opposite.

chsw

Posted by: chsw at 4 maart 2007 19:14

Ann and Michelle and Bill and Sean and Rush have such bloated egos that they really think they can do no wrong. The people who headed the Ku Klux Klan had similars ideas.

Posted by: homer at 4 maart 2007 22:21

I came across your blog...love it! I added you to my favorites...

Ann Coulter is the epitome of hate. And you are right, she has no right to talk about family values as someone who has never married. Her family values consist of teaching discrimination.

Gubin

gubinland.blogspot.com

Posted by: Gubin at 5 maart 2007 6:59

Ann Coulter is, like, so g-hey.

:)

Posted by: palochi at 5 maart 2007 13:47

I'd say she's the spawn of Beelzebub, but that would be insulting to the Prince of Darkness, really.

Posted by: Jeffrey at 5 maart 2007 14:17

Her little CPAC shtick reminded me of political comedy and not political commentary. Granted, those lines have blurred a lot, but not only did I not find her offensive, I found her John Stewart-esque. And I thought to myself, "Gee, I wonder if she's realized that her career route has lead her to a point of such absurdity that her only path of progress is to refashion herself as a comedienne."

I'm not saying she's as good as John Stewart. I doubt she could be, and even if she were, I'm sure I wouldn't find her funny because her humor is inherently more base. It's like potty humor for grown-ups. Still, if I were the CPAC attendee-type, I would have laughed too - mixing current events with name-calling - Oh, so clever, Ann!

Anybody who uses "faggot" should be treated to the same scrutiny as any other epithet user. Comedienne or no. Whether Ann's excuse for not being taken seriously becomes the same as J. Stewart's remains to be seen.

Posted by: Josh(ums) at 5 maart 2007 23:37

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)